Comp(TQC): A new way for integrating time, quality and cost perspectives when doing qualitative risk analysis

Demir, T; Bryde, D J; Fearon, D and Ochieng, E G (2011) Comp(TQC): A new way for integrating time, quality and cost perspectives when doing qualitative risk analysis. In: Egbu, C and Lou, E C W (eds.) Proceedings of 27th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2011, Bristol, UK.

Abstract

One of the most widely documented tools for risk analysis is the Probability-Impact (P-I) Table, which assesses the probability of occurrence of a risky event and its likely impact on the project objectives, which are typically articulated in terms of the Iron-Triangle of cost, time and quality. P-I Tables are typically used to help assess the downside of risk i.e. threats, rather than the upside of risk i.e. opportunities and the focus of this paper is on dealing with threats. Whilst there are numerous adaptations of the P-I Table, they all consistent in their approach to dealing with the cost, time and quality objectives in that the objectives are treated as independent and unrelated variables. This is a limitation of the P-I Table and reduces its practical applicability, as in most project contexts the probabilities and impacts of a risky event on the project objectives will be inter-related. To address this limitation this paper presents a new tool for analysing risk that uses vector theory to enable a single calculation of the overall probability and impact incorporating all three objectives in the Iron-Triangle to be made. The tool is exemplified through a practical application to a real case construction project, with the tool being used to support the analysis of threats to the project.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: iron-triangle; probability-impact tables; risk; vector theory
Index terms: adaptation, risk analysis, qualitative risk analysis, construction project
Subjects: research design and methodology, user focus, production management, environmental hazards
Topics: Project Management, Sustainability, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here