Wong, F P K; Oldfield, P and Osmond, P (2024) Industry perceptions of mass engineered timber (met) construction: A comparison of South-East Asia with other regions. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(6), pp. 1543-1565. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Mass Engineered Timber (MET) has emerged as an innovative construction material used in the creation of low-carbon buildings. However, more built examples are found in Europe and North America, with far fewer in Asia, despite its generally higher levels of construction. This research explores these trends by measuring building industry practitioners’ perceptions–their awareness, attitudes and perceived obstacles–across three regions experiencing different levels of MET adoption: Europe and North America (early adopters), Australia and New Zealand (early developing) and South-East Asia (under developed). The research develops a novel framework to understand industry perceptions of MET composed of ‘Enabling Parameters’ and ‘Decision-making Parameters’. This is used to develop a survey which was completed by 186 participants from the three regions. Results show that participants’ perceptions, knowledge and experience of MET are consistently lower in South-East Asia, than the other regions–a finding previously not identified in existing research. Protection against fire and water damage, ease of repair and maintenance, and perceived unsuitability of MET for high-rise building types are the primary concerns of practitioners in South-East Asia. This paper calls for technological advancements for taller MET and hybrid buildings, a review of building codes, provision of incentives, and education among practitioners to improve the perception and adoption of MET in South-East Asia.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | industry perceptions; innovation diffusion; mass engineered timber; South-East Asia; timber construction; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | survey, innovation diffusion, high-rise building, repair, building code, Asia, decision-making, questionnaire, practitioner, timber construction, Australia, low-carbon building, Europe, New Zealand, South-East Asia, construction material, building industry |
| Subjects: | Geography, maintenance engineering, physical geography and landforms, practitioner, construction type, design practice, industry analysis, regulatory law, decision analysis, sociology, data collection methods, regions and continents, building materials |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Design Practice, Risk Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here