Castán Broto, V; Olazabal, M and Ziervogel, G (2024) Disrupting the imaginaries of urban action to deliver just adaptation. Buildings & Cities, 5(1), pp. 199-214. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
Urban adaptation relates to how people imagine plausible and desirable urban futures. Adaptation imaginaries refer to collective representations of how society should act and towards which goal in the context of unprecedented climate change impacts. However, the existing narratives of adaptation action tend to entrench actions that may not be beneficial in the long term and may lead to maladaptation and inequities. This is the case, for example, of flood protection barriers that displace natural barriers, such as mangroves, or water distribution networks that supply water by depleting reserves elsewhere. New adaptation imaginaries will facilitate just adaptation and enable radical changes in the relationship between humans and their environment. One step to do so is to disrupt the dominant understandings of adaptation. The aim of this special issue is to demonstrate the multiple ways in which such disruption can happen. Three areas where disruption can happen are: (1) in international political narratives, (2) in the relationship between climate change and urbanisation and (3) in the implementation of action on the ground when action encounters the realities of infrastructure and service delivery. This special issue argues that the first step in delivering climate change adaptation is to foster new ways of imagining what adaptation is needed and how it should be delivered. First, there should be efforts to understand the assumptions embedded in dominant imaginaries of urban adaptation. Second, there is a need to understand how urbanisation changes how we imagine urban areas and their resilience. Third, radical attempts to reimagine adaptation are already taking place in daring adaptation practices. Fourth, disruptive frameworks exist to challenge dominant imaginaries, but there is a need for more practical, embedded experiences of urban adaptation alternatives.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cities; climate adaptation; climate justice; disruption; environmental discourses; future visioning; path-breaking; resilience; transformative adaptation; urban governance; urban planning |
| Index terms: | society, environmental discourse, climate justice, water distribution network, climate adaptation, narrative, urban area, climate change, urban planning, service delivery, urban governance, urbanization, adaptation, implementation |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, qualitative and interpretive research, service delivery, environmental policy, urban planning, contractual arrangements, user focus, climate science, communities and social development, urban form and morphology, social equity |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Project Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here