Mapping municipal land policies: Applications of flexible zoning for densification

Götze, V; Gerber, J D and Jehling, M (2024) Mapping municipal land policies: Applications of flexible zoning for densification. Buildings & Cities, 5(1), pp. 506-520. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

Municipalities develop individual land policies and can choose not to apply available planning instruments or to apply them differently than intended. While this strategic action can endanger the effectiveness of public policies, it is rarely considered in large-scale analyses. A new geospatial method is presented that captures such strategic action. Empirical evidence from the Canton of Bern, Switzerland, reveals municipalities' application of planned unit development (PUD), an instrument potentially allowing for flexible zoning negotiations to promote densification. Detailed zoning and building data from the period 2002–23 are used to examine the variation in PUD application by municipalities and whether they apply it to enable densification. Distinguishing by municipality type (i.e. urban core, small town, suburban, rural or touristic) reveals that PUD application is connected to projects with higher building density, more complex parcel changes and, for urban and suburban municipalities, higher density gains in low-density neighbourhoods. However, rural municipalities seldom apply PUD. New indicators of planning complexity provide an insight into whether municipalities apply instruments to enable densification under difficult circumstances.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: densification; flexible planning; land use; municipal strategies; planned unit development; planning instrument; Switzerland; zoning
Index terms: variation, densification, evidence, public policy, zoning, effectiveness, land use, Switzerland, municipality, land, strategy, density, complexity, negotiation, mapping
Subjects: administrative law, contractual condition, urban planning, Geography, analytical methods, management, performance management, evaluation and assessment methods, spatial and geospatial analysis, real estate economics, conflict resolution, systems engineering, public policy, urban design
Topics: Geographical Context, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Governance, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Contract Administration, Legal Issues, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here