Thermal and economic impact of geothermal passive cooling for eco-house applications in the maritime desert climate

Al-Janabi, A and Al-Khatri, H (2025) Thermal and economic impact of geothermal passive cooling for eco-house applications in the maritime desert climate. Building Research & Information, 53(1-2), pp. 220-241. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Creating comfortable indoor conditions to avoid heat-related health problems is associated with high power consumption, forcing countries with hot climates to seek alternative solutions. In this study, a geothermal passive cooling system was implemented in the maritime desert climate region in Muscat, Oman. The system consisted of multiple path tube configurations, each 5 m long of 10 cm × 10 cm in cross-section, and was buried 2 m underground. Fins were attached to three tube sides in one path to enhance the heat transfer rate. The path of the finned tube significantly reduced the air outlet temperature. The fins increased the temperature drop by a substantial percentage, often exceeding 100% and sometimes even reaching 300%. Installing the geothermal passive cooling system secured an average temperature drop of 7°C. This drop led to a reduction in electricity bills by 4.58% for finned tubes and 4.17% for unfinned tubes. The overall energy savings achieved by the system was 12.91%, demonstrating its potential for reducing energy consumption in desert climates. Future research should focus on identifying the optimal size for geothermal systems to enhance their thermal performance and economic benefits, developing advanced materials, and integrating the system with renewable technologies to maximize their advantages.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: eco-friendly; eco-house; energy saving; geothermal passive cooling; maritime desert climate
Index terms: renewable technology, economic impact, thermal performance, configuration, tube, Oman, hot climate, energy consumption, cooling system, energy-saving, power consumption
Subjects: mechanical systems, energy systems, systems engineering, materials science, climate science, Geography, sustainable design, financial analysis
Topics: Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here