Borrallo-Jiménez, M; Esquivias, P M; Fernández-Agüera, J and LopezDeAsiain, M (2025) Hybrid ventilation in a nearly zero-energy building as a function of users' habits for better indoor air quality and thermal comfort in a warm climate. Building Research & Information, 53(1-2), pp. 77-94. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
During the design stage of a detached house located in warm climate, passive strategies were integrated and a high-energy efficiency qualification was achieved in accordance with the Spanish Building Technical Code (CTE). During the execution phase, an elevated level of control was carried out to guarantee airtightness and thermal insulation quality according to the specifications of the project. A hybrid ventilation system was designed and installed as it was allowed under Spanish regulations for residential buildings, but as a legislative exception. The mechanical part of the hybrid ventilation system was deactivated by the owner due to his cultural perception that effective ventilation can only be achieved by opening windows. Consequently, with the operable aerators closed, ventilation relied solely on traditional Mediterranean airing habits, impacting both the indoor air change rate and subsequently, indoor air quality and thermal comfort. This research aims to assess whether satisfactory levels of thermal comfort and indoor air quality can be attained solely through these airing habits, thus questioning the necessity of active strategies to meet the indoor air change rate requirements. Thermal comfort and indoor air quality are evaluated based on indoor environmental data correlated with users' declared ventilation habits.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | airtightness; indoor air quality; natural ventilation; nearly zero-energy building; thermal comfort; user's habits |
| Index terms: | habit, indoor air quality, window, natural ventilation, design stage, regulation, strategy, ventilation, nearly zero-energy building, guarantee, specification, thermal insulation, thermal comfort, owner, residential building, energy efficiency, qualification |
| Subjects: | contractual condition, management, energy efficiency, contract structure, environmental health, environmental engineering, political science, sociology, air quality, energy systems, sustainability and energy, educational resources, architectural elements, health behaviours and lifestyles, construction type, professional practice |
| Topics: | Education, Sustainability, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Contract Administration, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Governance, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Construction Materials, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here