Design process for an occupant survey system to assess satisfaction with indoor environmental quality

Castro, L; De Vecchi, R and Lamberts, R (2025) Design process for an occupant survey system to assess satisfaction with indoor environmental quality. Building Research & Information, 53(1-2), pp. 242-260. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

User satisfaction surveys play a crucial role in assessing Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ). Yet, existing databases predominantly reflect data from developed countries, limiting applicability to culturally and climatically diverse regions. This study emphasizes the relevance of evaluating IEQ satisfaction in office buildings by proposing a standardized, open-access occupant survey system (OSS) for global application. User satisfaction surveys were selected as references from literature for screening and content analysis. The proposed OSS features a two-part survey that triggers detailed questions based on reported IEQ domain-related discomfort frequency. Evaluation process to ensure survey validity incorporated feedback from experts and laypersons. Additionally, a broader application was carried out with 115 office employees. Results identified prevalent issues such as acoustic and thermal discomfort, varying between open-plan and private office layouts. Participants' responses also showed a significant link between IEQ satisfaction and time spent at the workstation. Overall, the OSS demonstrates its potential as a cost-effective instrument to provide a comprehensive IEQ diagnostic based on occupants' perceptions. Future iterations should integrate concurrent building measurements to enhance evaluation precision and broaden the applicability of the survey tool across diverse environmental and cultural contexts.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: indoor environmental quality; occupant satisfaction; occupant survey system; office buildings; questionnaire survey
Index terms: user satisfaction, questionnaire, developed country, occupant survey, design process, content analysis, survey, office layout, indoor environmental quality, occupant satisfaction, satisfaction, office building, screening, database, validity, discomfort
Subjects: evaluation and assessment methods, construction type, client relations, development economics, specialized design, data collection methods, user-centered design, design methods, data analysis and analytics, project delivery, health risk and incident analysis, management, data management, environmental health
Topics: International Construction, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Sustainability, Project Management, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here