Mamari, M A; Khan, H M; Al Saadi, S and Al Hashim, A (2025) Impact of windcatcher on the thermal comfort and indoor air quality in a modern house. Building Research & Information, 53(1-2), pp. 204-219. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
As the residential construction sector grows more quickly than other building sectors in Oman and other GCC nations, the proportion of total energy consumption in housing rises. The native inhabitants have implemented various strategies to enhance the thermal conditions in structures. The windcatcher was one of those methods used in hot climates when it was vital to achieve thermal comfort. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is used in this research to find the best orientation of a windcatcher attached to a modern house in Muscat. In addition, thermal comfort and indoor air quality based on CO2 concentration were also studied. This paper tries to fill the gap in research on using windcatchers with modern houses and find the best design for such windcatchers. Results indicate that placing a windcatcher with a rotation of 30° from the north towards the east will give better air velocity than a windcatcher with angles of 0°, 45°, and 60°. Furthermore, it was found that the windcatcher improved the Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) by 34% and the Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfaction (PPD) by 48%. In addition, a modern house with a windcatcher reduced CO2 concentration by more than 5% compared to a house without a windcatcher.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building simulation; CFD; indoor air quality; thermal comfort; windcatcher |
| Index terms: | thermal comfort, strategy, housing, indoor air quality, residential construction, placing, Oman, hot climate, computational fluid dynamics, building simulation, energy consumption |
| Subjects: | concrete and cementitious materials, environmental engineering, construction type, construction integration, modelling and simulation, environmental health, climate science, management, Geography, energy systems |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Sustainability, Geographical Context, Construction Materials, Construction Technology, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here