Exploring the feasibility of mobile robots for post-occupancy evaluations

Zhao, Y; Mantha, B R K; Knijnenburg, B P and Li, D (2025) Exploring the feasibility of mobile robots for post-occupancy evaluations. Building Research & Information, 53(1-2), pp. 165-182. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Post-occupancy evaluation collects occupant feedback and assesses indoor environmental quality to enhance the indoor environment. Traditional paper- and web-based surveys have several limitations, such as discontinuous, labor-intensive, and suffer from low response rates and participation bias. Meanwhile, state-of-the-art IEQ monitoring methods have limited spatial resolution, cumbersome calibration and maintenance, and high costs. In this paper, a mobile sensing ComfyBot was developed to actively solicit occupants' feedback while continuously monitoring IEQ parameters, including temperature, humidity, sound, illuminance, and (Formula presented.). A one-week field experiment was conducted in three student offices, ranging from 480 to 1,620 (Formula presented.), on a university campus. 34 participants voluntarily participated, and the results showed that the ComfyBot: (1) significantly increased the response rate of the POE surveys from 0.13 to 0.90; (2) was perceived as useful with a mean usability score of 72.8 out of 100. Among the 23 valid exit-survey responses, 78% preferred responding to the ComfyBot survey and 87% expressed willingness to interact with the ComfyBot again; and (3) captured more representative sentiments of participants than email surveys. Therefore, the study contributes and concludes that ComfyBot enables facility managers to collect occupant feedback, measure continuous IEQ parameters and detect anomalies to create a healthy and sustainable indoor environment.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: human-robot interaction; indoor environmental quality; mobile robots; post-occupancy evaluation; questionnaire survey
Index terms: illuminance, indoor environment, post-occupancy evaluation, indoor environmental quality, monitoring, humidity, interaction, manager, survey, experiment, usability, spatial resolution, state of the art, questionnaire, bias
Subjects: climate science, practitioner, research dissemination and communication, environmental science, behavioral psychology, building performance, control systems, user-centered design, data collection methods, evaluation methods, probability and distributions, environmental health, measurement and scaling
Topics: Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Quality Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here