Lucas, A N and Löschke, S K (2025) Towards circular renovation: A comparative review of circular economy integration in sustainable building rating systems. Building Research & Information, 53(3), pp. 375-396. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Building renovation is widely considered an effective strategy for reducing the environmental impact of urban housing stock. In recent years, interest in 'circular renovation'–the application of Circular Economy approaches to building renovation–has grown but implementation pathways for circular renovations are still lacking. This study investigates Sustainable Building Rating Systems (SBRS) as an effective method to implement circular renovation by conducting a rigorous comparative analysis of residential SBRS against the established ReSOLVE framework's circularity principles (Regenerate, Share, Optimize, Loop, Virtualize, Exchange). The study focuses on apartment buildings dgiven their importance to urban housing stock and employs a qualitative content analysis on three SBRS (Living Building Challenge, Green Star Buildings, Building Sustainability Index) applicable to renovation. The research revealed that SBRS are progressing towards circularity but to varying extents and with different approaches. While Regenerate, Optimize, and Exchange principles are prominent, Share, Virtualize, and Loop need further integration in SBRS to facilitate circular renovation. The research also highlighted the potential social gaps of ReSOLVE. Although limited to three SBRS, the findings provide valid insights into Circular Economy integration in SBRS, thus synthesizing SBRS and Circular Economy knowledge and its implementation in apartment building renovation and beyond.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; circular economy; renovation; residential sector; resolve; sustainable building rating systems |
| Index terms: | circularity, circular economy, living building, implementation, renovation, building sustainability, built environment, apartment building, housing stock, strategy, content analysis, comparative analysis, integration, sustainable building, building renovation, environmental impact |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, sustainability and energy, management, renovation and retrofit, design practice, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, organizational analysis, sustainable materials, environmental impact, construction type, contractual arrangements, sustainable construction, sustainable design, asset management |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Procurement, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here