Delays, what delays? A critical review of the literature on delays in construction

Eizakshiri, F; Chan, P W and Emsley, M (2011) Delays, what delays? A critical review of the literature on delays in construction. In: Egbu, C and Lou, E C W (eds.) Proceedings of 27th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2011, Bristol, UK.

Abstract

Despite a wealth of research into the causes and impacts of delays in construction, time and cost overruns remain a perennial problem in the construction industry. In this critical review, the literature on delays in construction is revisited with a view to inject fresh perspectives of the problem. Early studies have adopted rational, naturalistic positions to explain structural characteristics that lead to project delays. These studies tend to place primacy on what contractors can do to manage and eradicate delays, and usually take the planned project time for granted. Recent attempts have been made to articulate the possibility of strategic misrepresentation that could result in under-estimation of project time and costs, which in turn creates a perceived delay. Through the review, it was found that the intentions of the multitude of actors involved in delivering construction projects remain a relatively under-researched area, especially during the fuzzy-front-end of the project life cycle. A case is made for the need to study how intentions of different project stakeholders in the early stages of the project could potentially create unintended delays. Specifically, a number of critical questions were raised, including how stakeholder intentions are collectively constituted, and whether intentionality materially influences planned and achieved schedules in projects.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: delay; front-end; intentionality
Index terms: project delay, construction industry, project stakeholder, construction project, estimation, cost overrun, life cycle
Subjects: value management, financial and cost management, production management, project controls, sociology, industry analysis
Topics: Cost Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here