Al-Harasis, D H; Jabi, W and Sharmin, T (2025) Developing a taxonomy for sensory-informed architectural design qualities in autism. Building Research & Information, 53(4), pp. 532-551. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Sensory-informed architectural design for autistic individuals can significantly enhance health and well-being. This study introduces a taxonomy to classify sensory and spatial design qualities, promoting a unified understanding of current frameworks. Through a literature review of 76 sources, 83 sensory-informed design qualities were identified. The sources were selected based on their relevance to autism-friendly design, ensuring a robust dataset for analysis. Critical gaps in the field were identified, including the reliance on intuition sensory zoning as the main driver for spatial topology without quantifying the sensory drivers, and an emphasis on interior design elements over spatial configuration. Furthermore, the lack of a classification system for the design qualities of autism was noted. Using a thematic analysis, this study proposes four main themes to form an original taxonomy for classifying sensory and design qualities. Unlike prior literature focusing on discrete design qualities, this taxonomy integrates and categorizes spatial- and sensory-based aspects into a comprehensive framework. The taxonomy systematically organizes design qualities into structured categories, offering a practical tool for designers, educators and policymakers. In conclusion, by addressing fragmented and vague design qualities in earlier research, this study bridges theoretical concepts with practical implementations by forming a solid base for future research.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architectural design qualities; autism spectrum disorder; autism-friendly design; inclusive design; sensory-informed design; taxonomy |
| Index terms: | dataset, literature review, thematic analysis, implementation, inclusive design, interior design, taxonomy, design quality, intuition, architectural design, health and wellbeing, designer, topology, zoning, spatial configuration |
| Subjects: | data management, specialized design, professional practice, design methods, geometry and topology, design practice, urban planning, mental health and wellbeing, cognitive psychology, contractual arrangements, methods and analysis, architectural design, data analysis and analytics, profession |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Health and Safety, Governance, Procurement, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here