Jiang, B; Nordin, J and Mohd Salleh, M N (2025) Design preferences for learning spaces among rural primary school students in China: A case study. Building Research & Information, 53(4), pp. 458-478. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
This study investigated the design preferences of rural primary school students with regard to learning spaces in Lianyungang, Jiangsu Province, China, focusing on spatial layout, physical attributes, technology and furniture arrangements. The research aimed to identify the critical needs of rural schools and students, especially in the context of China's education reform strategy. A combination of a tailored card-sorting activity and semi-structured interviews, specifically suited to the cognitive levels of primary school students, were used to gather data from 36 students across six grades in three case study schools. Findings revealed that students prefer flexible spaces equipped with modern technology and ergonomic furniture. Lower-grade primary school students favoured colourful, interactive spaces, while upper-grade primary students preferred more personalized learning and social spaces with advanced technology. The study emphasizes the need for future rural schools designs to incorporate updated technology and flexible furniture configurations to support the evolving teaching and learning methods. These findings also provide practical guidance for architects, educators and policymakers involved in the renewal and retrofitting projects of rural school buildings in China in the development of learning spaces aligned with Chinese education reforms and UNESCO's Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG4).
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | card-sorting; education reform; learning space; rural primary schools; student-centred design; unsdg4 |
| Index terms: | retrofitting, renewal, preference, China, configuration, school building, strategy, student-centred, interview, UNESCO, sustainable development goal, architect, learning space, case study |
| Subjects: | institutional frameworks, profession, data collection methods, systems engineering, student experience, management, renovation and retrofit, construction type, decision-making and reasoning, Geography, sustainable design |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Education, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Governance, Business Strategy, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here