Understanding the embodied carbon credentials of modern methods of construction

O'Hegarty, R; McCarthy, A; O'hagan, J; Thanapornpakornsin, T; Raffoul, S and Kinnane, O (2025) Understanding the embodied carbon credentials of modern methods of construction. Buildings & Cities, 6(1), pp. 70-89. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

This study assesses the embodied carbon credentials of modern methods of construction (MMC) by conducting a critical literature review and synthesis of the findings. While several studies have reviewed the broader impacts of MMC, no other study to date has comprehensively reviewed the embodied carbon credentials of this construction typology. Since MMC is not an internationally recognised term, the assessment is inclusive of other terminology used in different parts of the world – e.g. prefabrication, off-site construction and industrialised construction. The study captures 250 separate studies and distils these to a final sample set of 41 studies and a total of 82 case study comparisons. Although a general perception exists that the adoption of MMC results in embodied carbon savings, the evidence to support this claim is not robust. The results from individual case studies range significantly in both direction and magnitude, and, in the absence of a critical review, considerably different conclusions can be drawn. Upon critique and synthesis of the published studies, it is found that the adoption of MMC has no significant positive, or negative, impact on the embodied carbon of a building.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings; construction industry; embodied carbon; environmental impacts; life cycle analysis; modern methods of construction; prefabrication
Index terms: embodied carbon, literature review, life cycle analysis, environmental impact, evidence, industrialized construction, modern methods of construction, case study, critique, savings, off-site construction, prefabrication, construction industry
Subjects: data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, industry analysis, environmental impact, construction type, evaluation and assessment methods, economic analysis, building construction
Topics: Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here