Project managers' competencies in the era of digitalization: The case of the construction industry

Kissi, E; Eluerkeh, K; Aigbavboa, C; Addy, M and Babon-Ayeng, P (2025) Project managers' competencies in the era of digitalization: The case of the construction industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 15(1), pp. 165-189. ISSN 2044-124X

Abstract

Purpose: With emerging technologies rapidly changing work processes, it is important to understand the skills and characteristics project managers (PMs) need to effectively manage projects in the digital era. This study determines the underlying competencies needed for digitalization among PMs in the construction industry. The study also identified the most significant competencies needed by PMs in the era of digitalization. Design/methodology/approach: The methodology adopted for the research study was quantitative. It was founded on a thorough review of pertinent literature, which went through a pilot survey study from six project management experts in the construction industry. Based on the comment and feedback, a questionnaire survey was developed and distributed to participants through a convenience sampling technique. The data retrieved were from 100 professional PMs out of 130 questionnaires distributed in the Ghanaian construction industry. Data collected were analyzed using fuzzy synthetic evaluation (FSE). Findings: Based on FSE, the three competency parameters (knowledge, skills, personal characteristics) generated significant indices indicating that all three competencies are significant among construction PMs in the digitalization era. Under the knowledge competency parameter, six sub-competencies comprising a total of 12 variables were identified. For skills, seven sub-competencies consisting of 23 variables were identified. Regarding personal attributes, six sub-competencies with 17 variables were highlighted. Under knowledge, technical knowledge was found to be the most important with an index of 4.212. For skills, leadership skills were rated highest with an index of 4.240. Regarding personal attributes, social or interpersonal skills were deemed most critical with an index of 4.199. Practical implications: The results provide guidance to both industry and academic stakeholders. For PMs and their employers, the study highlights priority areas for competency development and training related to the era of digitalization. It also informs educational institutions on how to structure project management curricula to best prepare students for jobs of the future. This study gives more insight into the competencies that need more attention for PMs in the digitalization era. As a result, firms that adopt the identified competency will benefit from implementing digitalization in project delivery. Originality/value: This study makes an original contribution as one of the first to empirically investigate the competencies required of construction PMs in the construction industry in the digitalization era. By focusing on the developing country context of Ghana, the study extends knowledge to an under-researched region and market. It provides a foundation for future comparative research across diverse global contexts.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: competency; construction industry; digitalization; fuzzy synthetic evaluation; project managers; questionnaire survey
Index terms: survey, digitalization, methodology, Ghana, project manager, project delivery, project management, comparative research, developing country context, construction industry, emerging technology, interpersonal skill, sampling, questionnaire, fuzzy synthetic evaluation
Subjects: project delivery, decision-making and optimization, research design and methodology, human factors and perception, digital technology, industry analysis, innovation and technology management, project management theory and practice, profession, data collection methods, socioeconomic context, Geography, research methods
Topics: Governance, Geographical Context, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Research Practice, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here