Nazeer, F S; Kamardeen, I and Hasan, A (2025) Establishment of an end-user engaged building design framework. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 15(1), pp. 106-124. ISSN 2044-124X
Abstract
Purpose: Significant gaps between end-user expectations and the actual performance of buildings have been reported. Engaging end-users in the design phase is proposed to address this issue; however, practical implementation faces numerous challenges due to limited details of methods, tools and techniques for effective user engagement. This study aims to critically analyse the challenges in end-user engagement in the design process, thereby proposing a new, enhanced framework for end-user engaged building design. Design/methodology/approach: A systematic literature review was conducted, involving a comprehensive search across Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and Google Scholar, yielding 481 articles. After eliminating duplicates and irrelevant studies, this pool was narrowed down to 31. Meta-synthesis of the existing body of knowledge and its extrapolation were performed. Findings: Three design approaches – participatory, user-centred and co-design exist to facilitate user engagement during the design process, aiming to mitigate performance gaps. However, they encounter significant challenges, including a lack of standardised processes for identifying the right users, acquiring and reconciling end-user requirements and evaluating designs. A new framework for enhanced end-user engagement in the design phase is proposed to address these challenges. Originality/value: The proposed framework would enhance user engagement in building design, consequently mitigating performance gaps and bolstering occupant productivity and satisfaction. Additionally, the study identifies the challenges associated with the user-engagement process and consolidating user feedback, which is often vague and ambiguous by nature. Addressing these challenges is identified as future research needs to yield better outcomes from end-user engagement.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building design; co-design; end-user engagement; participatory design; systematic literature review; user-centred design |
| Index terms: | implementation, satisfaction, science, body of knowledge, building design, productivity, methodology, performance gap, design phase, user engagement, systematic literature review, face, user-centred design, user requirement, design process, participatory design |
| Subjects: | project delivery, research methods, specialized education, design methods, contractual arrangements, knowledge management, user-centred design, management, professional practice, research evaluation and metrics, performance management, architectural design, psychology, user-centered design |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Design Practice, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Organizational Design, Education, Business Strategy, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here