Lindhard, S M (2024) Danish contractor's application of the budget: Identifying purpose and comparing the budgets application level across job-position. Construction Economics and Building, 24(4-5), pp. 1-17. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
The construction contractors compete in a low-profit industry, making cost-performance and the accuracy and application of the budget critical. Despite the importance of a highly effective cost management, how construction contractors apply the budget has only received little attention in research. To determine how construction contractors apply budgets, a questionnaire study has been conducted, which included 128 construction professionals from varying job-positions of whom 67 completed the survey, corresponding to 52.3%. The participants rated their budget application with regards to six categories. Afterwards a statistical analysis was applied to identify ranks, differences, and correlations between categories and across job-positions. A calculation of the Kendall's Tau correlation revealed a positive ordinal correlation between the categories and their application, and a Friedman's Rank test identified the following rank between the categories: managerial action, control, planning, motivation, communication and coordination. Finally, a multinomial regression analysis revealed that a higher hierarchical position entails a higher application of the budget for all categories but motivation. The new insights to budget application are highly relevant for construction professionals carrying out cost-management. The findings can be to make a better fit between application and the presentation of the budget, thereby strengthening the managerial capability of the budget.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | budget; contractors; cost management; economy; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | strengthening, questionnaire, multinomial, construction contractor, motivation, profit, survey, accuracy, construction professional, coordination, regression analysis, statistical analysis, cost management |
| Subjects: | data science, data collection methods, statistical analysis, professional development, management, economic analysis, psychology, practitioner, accounting and finance, structural engineering |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Information Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here