Rotimi, F E; Brauner, M; Burfoot, M; Naismith, N; Silva, C and Mohaghegh, M (2024) Challenges faced by women in new zealand's construction industry and the impact of demographic factors. Construction Economics and Building, 24(4-5), pp. 114-141. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Diversity and inclusion of the construction workforce are considered fundamental to disrupting the perception of the male-dominated construction industry. Despite efforts to increase diversity and inclusion, the construction industry continues to record a slow increase in women's representation, resulting in the industry missing significant potential talent. Therefore, identifying challenges in women's work environment is vital for promoting construction careers. This study examines three categories of challenges: benevolent sexism, hostile sexism, and job conditions and the influences of demographic factors. The study adopted a quantitative research method, with 65 structured questionnaires completed by women working in the New Zealand construction industry. The study found that benevolent sexism challenges, such as stereotyping and pressure to prove oneself and hostile sexism challenges, like masculine culture, sexual harassment, and lack of respect, are significant for women in construction. A lack of female role models and work overload are two job condition-related challenges that affect women in the industry. The findings from this study are an important contribution to the existing literature, as they highlight the need to consider demographic factors when creating initiatives to address the challenges faced by women in the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | challenges; construction; job condition; sexism; women workforce |
| Index terms: | role model, New Zealand, quantitative research, demographic factor, work environment, women, construction industry, diversity and inclusion, career, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | sociology, industry analysis, management, professional development, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, demography, Geography |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Urban Studies, Human Resources, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Information Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here