Akotia, J and Awuzie, B (2025) Evaluating social sustainability factor prioritisation in sustainable urban regeneration projects: The case of UK construction industry. Construction Economics and Building, 25(1), pp. 4-24. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Social sustainability has been acknowledged as an essential component for delivering sustainable development objectives. While the importance of social sustainability has been well recognised by many construction industry practitioners, its core requirements have remained undefined. Many such social sustainability concepts have remained implicit and undefined. In some cases, they have been concealed behind a seemingly random choice of common socio-political indicators, hence making social sustainability requirements very difficult for practitioners to clearly specify and prioritise in an explicit manner and deliver them in practical terms. This study investigates the degree of consideration given to the promotion of social sustainability factors by practitioners engaged in the delivery of sustainable regeneration projects in the UK. It draws data from 15 interviewees and 122 respondents who participated in the study through semi-structured interviews and questionnaire surveys, respectively. The results reveal that health and safety issues were the most promoted among the other six key social sustainability issues considered by the majority of practitioners. The findings indicate that various efforts and legislations initiated by the UK government to improve health and safety practices within the construction industry have played a key role in practitioners' attitudes towards the promotion of health and safety issues in their practices.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | degree of consideration; regeneration practitioners; regeneration projects; social sustainability factors; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | social sustainability, construction industry, promotion, regeneration project, questionnaire, practitioner, health and safety issues, urban regeneration, health and safety practices, legislation, interview, sustainable development, survey |
| Subjects: | occupational health and safety management, industry analysis, management, post-disaster and reconstruction, data collection methods, communities and social development, economic development, health safety and environment, legal systems, practitioner |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Health and Safety, Human Resources, Urban Studies, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here