Alnaqbi, A; Al-Khateeb, G G and Zeiada, W (2025) Machine learning applications for predicting longitudinal cracking in continuously reinforced concrete pavement. Construction Economics and Building, 25(1), pp. 143-170. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
The longevity of continuously reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP) depends on the accurate prediction of longitudinal cracking. In this work, longitudinal cracking is predicted using machine learning algorithms, and data from the long-term pavement performance (LTPP) database. Multiple models, such as support vector machines (SVM), ensemble trees, Gaussian process regression (GPR), linear regression, regression trees, artificial neural networks (ANN), and kernel approaches, are compared. The Random Forest approach is used in statistical studies and feature relevance evaluation to identify temperature and annual average daily truck traffic (AADTT) as important predictors. R-squared and root mean squared error (RMSE) metrics are used to assess the models. Regression trees and ensemble approaches also perform competitively, but the GPR model with a squared exponential kernel performs better than the others, obtaining the best R-squared value (0.78) and the lowest RMSE (11.84). The study illustrates the shortcomings of traditional regression models and the benefits of sophisticated machine learning methods for identifying intricate nonlinear correlations. Sensitivity analysis demonstrates that pavement age, traffic loads, and environmental factors—specifically, temperature and precipitation—have a considerable impact on longitudinal cracking.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | continuously reinforced concrete pavement; longitudinal cracking; ltpp; machine learning; statistical analysis |
| Index terms: | machine learning application, database, statistical analysis, regression model, machine learning, environmental factor, precipitation, reinforced concrete, artificial neural network, forest, sensitivity analysis |
| Subjects: | environmental hazards, environmental science, climate science, statistical analysis, data management, artificial intelligence, data science, building materials, modelling and simulation |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Construction Materials, Digital Applications, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here