Almarri, K and Boussabaine, H (2025) Critical success factors for public–private partnerships in smart city infrastructure projects. Construction Innovation, 25(2), pp. 224-247. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: Scaling up smart city infrastructure projects will require a large financial investment. Using public–private partnerships is one of the most effective ways to address budget constraints. Numerous factors have varying degrees of influence on the performance of Public private partnerships (PPP) projects; certain PPP factors are more crucial to the success of a smart city infrastructure project than others, and their influence can be greatly increased when they are fulfilled collectively. This study aims to find out what factors are unique to smart city PPP initiatives, as well as how these factors work together, so that successful smart city infrastructure PPP projects can be scaled up. Design/methodology/approach: The methodology included three sequential stages: identifying the critical success factors (CSF) of PPP for smart cities based on an extensive literature review, collecting data from a sample of 90 PPP practitioners using a Likert scale questionnaire and estimating interrelationships among the CSF and their emergent clusters using structural equation modelling. Findings: The best fit model developed in this study demonstrated the significance of each factor and their interrelationships within their categories in enhancing the performance of PPPs in smart city infrastructure projects. Five categories of critical success factors for PPPs in smart city infrastructure projects have been established: partnership and collaboration; financial sustainability; contractual duties and outsourcing; smart integration; and contract governance. Practical implications: The proposed model represented the causal interrelationships among relevant critical success factors derived from literature, which may help in directing the organization's attention and resources to more critical areas, leading to the effective fulfilment of the smart city infrastructure project's objectives. In addition to the theoretical and methodological contributions, this study produced a usable and readily adaptable list and clusters of critical success factors for research in the area of the implementation of PPP in smart city infrastructure projects. Originality/value: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to identify PPP critical success factors and their themed clusters for smart city infrastructure projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | critical success factors; PPP; public procurement; public procurements; SEM; smart city infrastructure projects; smart procurements |
| Index terms: | duty, estimating, critical success factor, practitioner, Likert scale, questionnaire, integration, methodology, collaboration, contract governance, structural equation modelling, literature review, scaling, public private partnership, implementation, infrastructure project, budget constraint, smart city, partnership, outsourcing |
| Subjects: | research methods, practitioner, organization, contractual role, corporate governance, contractual arrangements, management, statistical analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, partnership management, organizational analysis, urban sustainability, control systems, business, data collection methods, financial and cost management, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Governance, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Urban Studies, Procurement, Project Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here