Gurmu, A; Hosseini, M R; Arashpour, M and Lioeng, W (2025) Development of building defects dashboards and stochastic models for multi-storey buildings in Victoria, Australia. Construction Innovation, 25(2), pp. 594-619. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: Building defects are becoming recurrent phenomena in most high-rise buildings. However, little research exists on the analysis of defects in high-rise buildings based on data from real-life projects. This study aims to develop dashboards and models for revealing the most common locations of defects, understanding associations among defects and predicting the rectification periods. Design/methodology/approach: In total, 15,484 defect reports comprising qualitative and quantitative data were obtained from a company that provides consulting services for the construction industry in Victoria, Australia. Data mining methods were applied using a wide range of Python libraries including NumPy, Pandas, Natural Language Toolkit, SpaCy and Regular Expression, alongside association rule mining (ARM) and simulations. Findings: Findings reveal that defects in multi-storey buildings often occur on lower levels, rather than on higher levels. Joinery defects were found to be the most recurrent problem on ground floors. The ARM outcomes show that the occurrence of one type of defect can be taken as an indication for the existence of other types of defects. For instance, in laundry, the chance of occurrence of plumbing and joinery defects, where paint defects are observed, is 88%. The stochastic model built for door defects showed that there is a 60% chance that defects on doors can be rectified within 60 days. Originality/value: The dashboards provide original insight and novel ideas regarding the frequency of defects in various positions in multi-storey buildings. The stochastic models can provide a reliable point of reference for property managers, occupants and sub-contractors for taking measures to avoid reoccurring defects; so too, findings provide estimations of possible rectification periods for various types of defects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction defects; data mining; digitalization; machine learning; simulation |
| Index terms: | methodology, sub-contractor, high-rise building, machine learning, toolkit, building defect, manager, digitalization, mining, plumbing, construction industry, data mining, dashboard, becoming, construction defect, Victoria, estimation, Australia |
| Subjects: | artificial intelligence, data science, contract obligations, financial and cost management, regions and continents, mechanical systems, geotechnical engineering, industry analysis, software systems, digital technology, professional practice, construction type, practitioner, philosophical process, research methods, Geography |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here