Mahamivanan, H; Ghassemi, N; Tayarani Darbandy, M; Shoeibi, A; Hussain, S; Nasirzadeh, F; Alizadehsani, R; Nahavandi, D; Khosravi, A and Nahavandi, S (2025) Material recognition for construction quality monitoring using deep learning methods. Construction Innovation, 25(3), pp. 732-760. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to propose a new deep learning technique to detect the type of material to improve automated construction quality monitoring. Design/methodology/approach: A new data augmentation approach that has improved the model robustness against different illumination conditions and overfitting is proposed. This study uses data augmentation at test time and adds outlier samples to training set to prevent over-fitted network training. For data augmentation at test time, five segments are extracted from each sample image and fed to the network. For these images, the network outputting average values is used as the final prediction. Then, the proposed approach is evaluated on multiple deep networks used as material classifiers. The fully connected layers are removed from the end of the networks, and only convolutional layers are retained. Findings: The proposed method is evaluated on recognizing 11 types of building materials which include 1,231 images taken from several construction sites. Each image resolution is 4,000 × 3,000. The images are captured with different illumination and camera positions. Different illumination conditions lead to trained networks that are more robust against various environmental conditions. Using VGG16 model, an accuracy of 97.35% is achieved outperforming existing approaches. Practical implications: It is believed that the proposed method presents a new and robust tool for detecting and classifying different material types. The automated detection of material will aid to monitor the quality and see whether the right type of material has been used in the project based on contract specifications. In addition, the proposed model can be used as a guideline for performing quality control (QC) in construction projects based on project quality plan. It can also be used as an input for automated progress monitoring because the material type detection will provide a critical input for object detection. Originality/value: Several studies have been conducted to perform quality management, but there are some issues that need to be addressed. In most previous studies, a very limited number of material types were examined. In addition, although some studies have reported high accuracy to detect material types (Bunrit et al., 2020), their accuracy is dramatically reduced when they are used to detect materials with similar texture and color. In this research, the authors propose a new method to solve the mentioned shortcomings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction monitoring; deep learning; material classification; material recognition; quality control; vgg16 algorithm |
| Index terms: | methodology, construction project, progress monitoring, environmental conditions, object detection, construction quality, specification, accuracy, construction site, building material, monitoring, quality control, quality management, resolution, deep learning, automated construction |
| Subjects: | quality assurance, research methods, production management, automation and robotics, computer vision, environmental science, project controls, conflict resolution, contractual condition, professional development, building materials, work location, artificial intelligence, project delivery, control systems |
| Topics: | Project Management, Sustainability, Quality Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Time Control, Contract Administration, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here