Vijayakumar, A; Mahmood, M N; Gurmu, A; Kamardeen, I and Alam, S (2025) Critical indicators for assessing the life cycle social footprint of Australian freeways. Construction Innovation, 25(3), pp. 819-842. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: Freeways in Australia play a significant role in connecting distant communities, shifting freight and strengthening the country's economy. To meet the growing needs of present and future generations, delivering a socially sustainable road infrastructure that creates generational benefits is essential. However, the existing literature reveals the lack of comprehensive indicators to assess the social sustainability performance of freeway projects. Therefore, this paper aims to identify a critical set of system-specific indicators to evaluate the life cycle social footprint of Australian freeways. Design/methodology/approach: This study conducted 31 interview questionnaire surveys with actively engaged stakeholders involved in various freeway projects around Australia. The data collected was analysed using fuzzy set theory and other statistical approaches. Findings: The study identified 42 critical indicators for assessing the social sustainability performance throughout the life cycle of freeways in the Australian context. For example, stakeholder involvement, reduction of casualty rate due to road accidents, fair remuneration to project workforce and improved accessibility to required services. Practical implications: The context-specific opinions extracted from the industry experts and the comprehensive set of critical indicators identified would ensure that all the vital aspects of social sustainability are considered throughout the life cycle of Australian freeways in the future, assisting the decision-makers in enhancing the project's social sustainability performance. Originality/value: The linguistic explanations associated with the ratings given by the industry experts provide greater insight into the context of the life cycle social sustainability assessment of Australian freeways exclusively.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | freeways; fuzzy set theory; road infrastructure; social criteria; social indicators; social sustainability; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | stakeholder involvement, questionnaire, strengthening, methodology, survey, interview, social sustainability, fuzzy set theory, Australia, life cycle, accessibility |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, value management, participation process, research methods, inclusive design, structural engineering, Geography, communities and social development, decision-making and optimization |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here