af Hällström, A; Bosch-Sijtsema, P and Poblete, L (2025) Challenges with collaboration: The interaction of formal and informal ties in infrastructure construction. Construction Management and Economics, 43(1), pp. 7-25. ISSN 0144-6193
Abstract
Collaborative project delivery models (CPDM) have been introduced in infrastructure construction delivery to improve project outcomes and reduce adversity characteristic for the field. Recent research discusses the interaction of formal and informal governance but highlights the need for further research into the interaction as well as its functions and dysfunctions. With help of a social network lens, we study how collaboration in a CPDM can be understood by the interaction of formal and formal ties and their (dys)functions. Based on 45 in-depth interviews, observations and document analysis, we studied two major infrastructure construction projects utilising a CPDM and the challenges caused by the interaction of formal and informal ties. Our results indicate that these two types of ties interact in a cyclic fashion, where formal ties form the foundation to develop informal ties, and informal ties shape how formal ties are understood. Strong formal and informal ties have both positive as well as negative consequences for collaboration in a CPDM. Furthermore, although these challenges can be beneficial to certain parties in the project, they can also be dysfunctional to other parties. The research contributes to the academic debate on the interplay between formal and formal ties.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | formal ties; informal ties; infrastructure construction; project delivery; project network; tie interaction |
| Index terms: | project outcome, document analysis, governance, project delivery, interaction, collaborative project, social network, project network, interview, infrastructure construction, collaboration |
| Subjects: | sociology, civil engineering, management, project delivery, data science, business, data collection methods, behavioral psychology, project planning, contractual arrangements, project completion |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Project Management, Procurement, Research Practice, Governance, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here