Wanigarathna, N; Xie, Y; Henjewele, C; Morga, M and Jones, K (2025) Machine learning application to disaster damage repair cost modelling of residential buildings. Construction Management and Economics, 43(4), pp. 302-322. ISSN 0144-6193
Abstract
Restoring residential buildings following earthquake damage requires a significant level of resources. Being able to predict these resource requirements in advance and accurately improves the effectiveness of disaster preparedness and subsequent recovery activities. This research explored how the latest ML algorithms could be used for antecedent earthquake loss modelling. A cost database for repairing residential buildings damaged by the Emilia Romagna earthquake in Italy was analysed using six state-of-the-art ML models to explore their ability to predict repair cost rates(cost per floor area) for a domestic building damaged by earthquakes. A Gradient Boost Regression model outperformed five other models in predicting earthquake damage repair cost rate. The performance of this model was significantly accurate and covers about 76% of the cases. A further SHAP analysis revealed that operational level, damage level and non-housing area of the buildings as top 3 important features when predicting the resultant damage repair cost rate. Overall this research advanced antecedent earthquake loss modelling approaches to increase the accuracy of estimates by incorporating more variables than the widely used damage level based simple methodology.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost modelling; damage repair costs; disaster preparedness; earthquake; machine learning |
| Index terms: | earthquake, effectiveness, modelling, estimate, machine learning application, recovery, residential building, regression model, database, methodology, Italy, state of the art, repair, machine learning, housing, disaster preparedness, domestic building, accuracy |
| Subjects: | Geography, maintenance engineering, research methods, environmental hazards, construction type, research dissemination and communication, analytical methods, operations management, professional development, performance management, safety engineering, statistical analysis, data management, artificial intelligence, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Construction Technology, Quality Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here