Implementing circular economy principles in infrastructure procurement to support circular supply chains

Karlovsek, J; Meath, C; Miles-Mwangangi, L; MacDonald, C and Brockmann, A (2024) Implementing circular economy principles in infrastructure procurement to support circular supply chains. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(11), pp. 4645-4658. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this paper is to study the procurement of infrastructure through the lens of circular economy (CE) principles to achieve contractual delivery methods which promote circular supply chains. Design/methodology/approach: This paper provides an analysis of the key concepts related to the research topic based on a review of recent academic literature. Moreover, based on the empirical and academic experience of the authors in the infrastructure industry, there are multiple actionable discussion points which are raised. However, the research for this paper was undertaken with a focus on literature rather than direct observations and empirical research, which may limit discussion to scholarly rather than practical applications. Findings: The paper finds that CE principles can be leveraged to capture additional economic benefit in the infrastructure industry. In addition, there are specific project delivery methods which may act as workable practices towards more circular supply chains. Originality/value: The value of this paper is in the CE-related suggestions the paper provides to procurement practitioners. This work also attempts to link contractual procurement with tangible outcomes across the project lifecycle, including operation and end of life (EOL) of the infrastructure asset.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: approach; construction; supply chain
Index terms: practitioner, project delivery, circular economy, project lifecycle, delivery method, end of life, direct observation, methodology
Subjects: practitioner, project completion, research methods, strategic project management, project delivery, sustainable design, delivery method, data collection methods
Topics: Procurement, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Research Practice, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here