Digital twins in lean construction: A neutrosophic AHP – BOCR analysis approach

Altan, E and Işık, Z (2024) Digital twins in lean construction: A neutrosophic AHP – BOCR analysis approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(12), pp. 5029-5056. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Increasing complexity in construction projects evokes interest in application of innovative digital technologies in construction. Digital twins (DT), which bring these innovative technologies together, have strong interactions with lean construction (LC). To highlight the collaborative nature of DT and LC, the paper explores the interactions between LC and DT and assesses benefits, costs, opportunities and risks (BOCR) of DT in LC to analyze significant obstacles and enablers in DT adoption in LC. Design/methodology/approach: BOCR approach comprehensively considers both the positive and the negative attributes of a problem. At the first step, BOCR criteria for DT are identified through literature review and expert opinions, at the second step dependencies among BOCR criteria for DT in LC are determined by neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process (AHP), through a questionnaire survey. Integrating BOCR into neutrosophic AHP enables achieving more meaningful preference scores. Findings: Cost of skilled workforce is the most important factor and opportunity to reduce waste is the second most important factor in adoption of DT in LC. The results were analyzed to rank the BOCR of adoption of DT in LC. Originality/value: This study, in a novel way, performs BOCR analysis through neutrosophic AHP to reflect experts' judgments more effectively by neutrosophic AHP's better handling of vagueness and uncertainty. The paper provides a model to better understand the significant factors that influence adoption of DT in LC.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: decision support systems; information systems; questionnaire survey; technology; questionnaire survey
Index terms: decision support, lean construction, survey, literature review, questionnaire, construction project, methodology, complexity, digital technology, digital twin, information system, preference, judgment, interaction
Subjects: information systems, systems engineering, decision analysis, data analysis and analytics, dispute resolution, computing systems, data collection methods, behavioral psychology, building construction, production management, research methods, decision-making and reasoning, digital engineering
Topics: Legal Issues, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Site Management, Digital Applications, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here