Koc, K; Durdyev, S; Tleuken, A; Ekmekcioglu, O; Mbachu, J and Karaca, F (2024) Critical success factors for construction industry transition to circular economy: Developing countries' perspectives. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(12), pp. 4955-4974. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Circular economy (CE) is increasingly used as a system solution framework for tackling climate change. Existing CE solutions have been found effective in other sectors but ineffective in the construction sector (CS) due to the inability to account for unique CS dynamics that are essential for its success. With CS being one of the worst polluters, this research aimed to investigate critical success factors (CSFs) and a practical CE implementation framework for the sector. Design/methodology/approach: Mixed methods research involving descriptive surveys of construction professionals in Kazakhstan, Malaysia and Turkey was used to explore priority dimensions of McKinsey's ReSOLVE ("regenerate, share, optimize, loop, virtualize and exchange") circulatory framework, and the associated CSFs that underpin successful implementation of CE in the sector. Empirical data were analyzed using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (F-AHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) algorithm. Findings: Results showed that "Optimize" and "Loop" were the most critical of the six dimensions of CE implementation framework for successful circularity transition of the CS in each case study country. Twenty-seven CSFs identified in the study were clustered into seven key action areas for successful rollout of the ReSOLVE framework, namely, legislative and documentation, financial, design, external/stakeholder, technological, internal and construction/production/waste management. Practical implications: The study makes a unique contribution to existing knowledge by exploring ReSOLVE-based CSFs for successful CE implementation in the CS through the lenses of experienced construction practitioners and experts in developing countries. The findings are expected to provide a deeper insight into the most significant CSFs to be focused on with the limited resources available to decision-makers in the CS. The findings would also inform regulatory policy reformations aimed at facilitating greater rate of implementation of CE in the construction value chain. Originality/value: The study – the first of its kind – established and validated a wholistic and construction-specific CE implementation framework to guide built environment professionals and policymakers in formulating a roadmap for successful CS's transition to circularity and hopefully paving the way for improved economic, social and environmental performance of the sector.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | circular economy; circularity; construction sector; fuzzy AHP; fuzzy TOPSIS |
| Index terms: | circular economy, circularity, topsis, fuzzy topsis, Turkey, mixed method, case study, value chain, Malaysia, environmental performance, dimension, analytical hierarchy process, construction industry, implementation, built environment, dynamics, construction professional, construction practitioner, documentation, survey, paving, developing country, climate change, polluter, key action, construction sector, critical success factor, preference, waste management, Kazakhstan, methodology |
| Subjects: | development economics, sustainable design, Geography, decision-making and reasoning, research methods, sustainability assessment, transportation engineering, decision-making and optimization, climate science, sustainable materials, waste management, contractual arrangements, environmental policy, value chain strategy, professional development, systems engineering, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, control systems, data collection methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics |
| Topics: | Supply Chain Management, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Procurement, Urban Studies, International Construction, Information Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here