Evaluation of field labor and management productivity in the USA construction industry

Jahanger, Q K; Trejo, D and Louis, J (2025) Evaluation of field labor and management productivity in the USA construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(1), pp. 259-281. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The health of an economy is heavily dependent on the productivity of the economy's major industries including construction. While most macro-measures of productivity in the USA construction industry indicate a decline, corresponding studies at the individual task level indicate an increase in productivity. Therefore, this paper aims to identify areas where productivity challenges exist and thus provide recommendations for improvement in the construction industry. Design/methodology/approach: A model that relates the way construction projects are executed with the sources of data that inform productivity analyses is developed and presented. This effort/value-flow model informs the data analysis that is performed to determine productivity trends for management and field labor. Further analysis for field labor productivity using field data and management productivity was separately conducted. Management productivity was particularly difficult to gauge, resulting in the use of surrogate measures. Findings: It was observed that while both field labor and management productivities at the industry level have been decreasing, the decrease in management productivity was five times that of field labor productivity. A similar trend was observed for management productivity at the project level. Originality/value: The primary contribution of this paper to the body of knowledge and industry is the introduction of a holistic analysis of USA construction productivity. Recommendations to improve management productivity include the use of technology, especially project management software.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; labor; management; productivity
Index terms: data analysis, body of knowledge, methodology, construction project, project management software, productivity, construction industry, construction productivity, labour productivity
Subjects: industry analysis, management, data analysis and analytics, production management, research methods, knowledge management, operations management, digital technology
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Site Management, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here