Lin, W; Wang, G; Ning, Y; Ma, Q and Dai, S (2025) The effects of performance measurement on megaproject performance: The moderating effects of project complexity. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(1), pp. 172-193. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Megaproject performance measurement (MPM) has received great attention in the project management community, but it primarily focused on the design of performance measures or frameworks. Yet, whether MPM utilization can improve megaproject performance and how project actors use MPM to improve megaproject performance is less well understood. This study aims to investigate whether and how the use of MPM can contribute to better megaproject performance. Design/methodology/approach: Through the lens of the lever of control, this study conceptualizes MPM utilization as diagnostic use and interactive use. A holistic research model and related hypotheses integrating MPM use, project complexity and megaproject performance were established. The model was validated using a partial square-structural equation modeling method. Findings: Based on 214-megaproject data collected through a questionnaire survey in China, the results show positive effects of diagnostic use and interactive use on megaproject performance. Both, however, have substitutional interaction effects. The moderating results suggest that the higher project complexity weakens the positive effects of MPM utilization on megaproject performance. Originality/value: This study advances megaprojects performance measurement and management literature by validating the value of MPM utilization on performance. It also presents practical implications for project managers to improve performance by appropriate MPM utilization.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | diagnostic use; interactive use; megaproject performance; megaproject performance measurement; project complexity; the lever of control; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | survey, structural equation modelling, performance measure, megaproject, project complexity, China, questionnaire, methodology, project manager, performance measurement, project management, interaction |
| Subjects: | behavioral psychology, Geography, organizational theory, research methods, strategic project management, statistical analysis, project management theory and practice, performance measurement, profession, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here