Construction group conflict under resource overlap: A game theory approach

Peng, J and Zhang, Q (2025) Construction group conflict under resource overlap: A game theory approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(1), pp. 156-171. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The replenishment of construction materials heavily relies on the functioning of heavy machinery, which often leads to confusion and negotiations among construction work groups regarding the allocation rights of these materials. When multiple groups require the same construction materials, they often struggle to determine whether the delivered materials are intended for their own use or if they have encroached upon supplies designated for others. Such uncertainties and negotiations frequently result in delays in construction progress and have the potential to escalate into conflicts. To minimize misunderstandings among work groups and mitigate the risk of severe safety consequences, it is crucial to understand the decision-making processes involved in the interaction between work groups. Design/methodology/approach: This paper adopts a game theory approach to examine the interactions among work groups from a safety perspective. Quantum response equilibrium (QRE), as a specialized form of game with incomplete information, is assumed to govern the behavior of work groups in this study. By conducting a questionnaire survey, interactive scenarios were simulated. A resource overlap scenario for high-altitude construction is established, with the key factors being the importance of construction materials, the time required to supplement materials, whether managers are present and the climate within the groups. The model parameters were estimated using the expectation–maximization algorithm. Additionally, individual traits and safety awareness are surveyed in the questionnaire, further explaining the results of the game. Findings: The findings indicate that the likelihood of conflicts between work groups under resource overlap can be quantified. The radical behavior of construction work groups exhibits a positive correlation with the importance of construction materials and the time required for material replenishment. Furthermore, the presence of a safety climate and the oversight of management personnel play a significant role in maintaining the composure of construction work groups. The expanded results of the questionnaire demonstrate that there is considerable room for improvement in workers' safety awareness, and management approaches can be further enhanced to prevent unsafe behaviors from occurring. Originality/value: A novel game theory model was developed to evaluate the behavior of construction groups in situations of resource overlap. This model offers practical suggestions to improve safety performance and efficiency in construction projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: game theory; group conflict; quantum response equilibrium; resource overlap; questionnaire survey
Index terms: survey, maximization, game theory, safety climate, unsafe behaviour, personnel, manager, safety performance, questionnaire, construction project, methodology, decision-making process, efficiency, negotiation, interaction, construction work, presence, construction material
Subjects: environmental science, operations management, practitioner, behavioral psychology, financial risk, production management, health safety and environment, algorithms, research methods, decision models, building materials, data collection methods, decision analysis, occupational health and safety management, conflict resolution, performance management, management
Topics: Risk Management, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Quality Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here