Interregional migration of construction workers in China: Roles of employment opportunities and environment amenities

Yang, H; Li, H; Wang, G and Cao, D (2025) Interregional migration of construction workers in China: Roles of employment opportunities and environment amenities. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(1), pp. 87-108. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Within the labor-intensive construction industry characterized by distinctly structural shortages in the labor force worldwide, efficient and effective migration of construction workers across regions is critical for the smooth operation of construction activities. This study aims to investigate how the interregional migration patterns of construction workers are impacted by the disparities in both employment opportunities and environment amenities between the origin and destination provinces. Design/methodology/approach: Drawing on the push and pull theory and the archival data on 13,728 migrant construction workers in China, descriptive analyses are first performed to characterize the interregional migration patterns of the investigated construction workers. Combining regional data in the National Bureau of Statistics of China, this study uses hierarchical regression modeling techniques to empirically test the relative importance of the employment-related and environment-related factors in driving the interregional migration of construction workers after controlling for the effects of related economic and geographic factors. Findings: The results provide evidence that the interregional migration of construction workers is principally driven by the disparities in employment opportunities while disparities in environment amenities (including climate comfort disparity, medical service disparity and educational service disparity) generally play much fewer substantive roles. With regard to the impacts of employment opportunities, the results provide evidence that compared with the disparity in job market size, the disparities in job income and industry development level are more significantly relevant factors, which positively pull and adversely push the interregional migration flows, respectively. Research limitations/implications: This study contributes to a deepened understanding of how workers specifically balance their employment and amenity needs to make temporary migration decisions in the "laggard" labor-intensive construction industry. This study also adds to the literature on population migration by characterizing the specific characteristics of construction workers and the temporary nature of the workers' migration activities. The findings hold important practical implications for construction organizations and policymakers for effectively managing the mobility of migrant construction workers. Originality/value: The extant literature on migrant construction workers has primarily focused on the consequences of international migration and the generalization of empirical findings on population migration mechanisms in other domains to the construction industry is substantially limited by the specific characteristics of construction workers and the temporary nature of their migration activities. In addressing this gap, this study represents an exploratory effort to quantitatively characterize the interregional migration patterns of construction workers in the labor-intensive construction industry and examines the roles of employment opportunity and environmental amenity in driving interregional migration.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: employment opportunities; environment amenities; interregional migration; migrant construction workers; push and pull theory
Index terms: mobility, construction organization, migration, construction activity, employment, comfort, income, industry development, statistics, construction worker, disparity, construction industry, labour force, relative importance, regression modelling, drawing, evidence, population, methodology, shortages, China
Subjects: practitioner, organization, evaluation and assessment methods, economic analysis, construction operations, Geography, research methods, social justice, demography, mathematical modelling, risk assessment, technical documentation, economics, management, statistical analysis, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, occupational health and safety management
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Human Resources, Site Management, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Supply Chain Management, Ethics
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here