Coffie, G H; Novieto, D T and Yankah, J E (2025) Stakeholder views of prevalent unethical practices in the Ghanaian construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(2), pp. 1010-1031. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to investigate stakeholders' perception of the most prevalent unethical practices in the Ghanaian construction industry. Design/methodology/approach: Data used for this study came from a cross-sectional survey (questionnaire), which was administered to 273 stakeholders in the construction industry using convenience sampling technique. The data were analyzed using statistical software package SPSSv17 to determine the most prevalent unethical practices. The ranking factor was calculated based on relative importance index (RII) value. Findings: The results of this study reveal that corruption was perceived by major stakeholders as the most prevalent unethical behavior (RII = 0.82) followed by bribery (RII = 0.79). Political interference and kickback came third (RII = 0.77) and fourth (RII = 0.74), respectively. However, the least prevalent unethical behaviors were extortion (RII = 0.56), workplace violence (RII = 0.57), alcohol abuse (RII = 0.59) and harassment (RII = 0.59). The findings suggest that when the various groupings were taken into consideration separately, the differences in their perceptions were obvious. Research limitations/implications: Data for this study were collected from construction stakeholders in Ghana who were conveniently sampled. As a result, in reference to the sampling framework which focused on major stakeholders in only two regions of Ghana does not sufficiently ensure full generalization of the results. Practical implications: The findings of the study provide significant information for construction organizations and practitioners regarding unethical practices, which are most prevalent in the Ghanaian construction industry. Construction organizations and practitioners seeking to mitigate the negative effect of unethical practices on their performance should focus on educating construction workers on how to avoid corrupt practices and report same to the authorities. Also, ethics training programs must be instituted for staff coupled with constant and random inspection and checking of ethical compliance, verbal promotion and praise for ethical conduct and in some cases increase in employees pay. Originality/value: This paper is one of the first to have accessed the views of broader stakeholders, i.e. consultants, contractors, professionals, suppliers, regulators, clients and construction workers in the construction industry regarding the most prevalent unethical practices in the Ghanaian construction industry in one study. This study, therefore, enriches the current literature by providing additional dimension to the understanding of unethical practices in the Ghanaian construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | corruption; Ghanaian construction industry; stakeholders' perception; unethical practices; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | unethical practices, dimension, construction worker, construction industry, sampling, ethical conduct, Ghana, inspection, regulator, ethics, promotion, construction organization, alcohol, questionnaire, practitioner, corruption, program, methodology, software package, survey, relative importance index, compliance |
| Subjects: | management, software systems, industry analysis, sociology, data collection methods, risk assessment, health monitoring assessment and metrics, health safety and environment, Geography, research methods, professional ethics, quality assurance, practitioner, organization, ethical practice, psychology |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Quality Management, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here