Kassa, R; Ogundare, I; Lines, B; Smithwick, J B; Kepple, N J and Sullivan, K T (2025) Developing a construct to measure contractor project manager performance competencies. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(3), pp. 2003-2021. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Construction organizations' investment in effective talent-development programs is a key strategy in attracting, developing and retaining staff. Such programs are especially important given the current challenges in the construction workforce, including labor shortages, an aging workforce, generational differences in the workforce, supply chain disruptions and the need to effectively train staff in the skills that are essential in a constrained labor environment. To address these challenges, this study proposes a performance measurement strategy that construction companies can use as input to design their talent development programs. Design/methodology/approach: The strategy intends to assess the performance of project managers and develop criteria that define categories of their performance, including the top performers' category. This enables construction organizations to provide each project manager with individualized training that addresses areas of weakness and in turn, develops the skills that correspond with being top performers. The proposed strategy was developed and tested by surveying the immediate supervisors of 187 project managers working for general and specialty contractors in the United States. Principal component analysis was used to develop a single performance construct from seven performance criteria. Findings: This construct was used to organize the project managers into the categories of top, above-average and below-average performers. According to the findings, top-performing project managers have well-rounded skills in the areas of leadership, communication, technical proficiency and overall job knowledge. Practical implications: The outcomes of this study can help construction organizations focus their talent-development programs on the skills most associated with PMs being top performers. Originality/value: This study provides construction organizations with a comprehensive performance-measuring construct to focus their talent-development programs on the skills most associated with top-performing project managers. Researchers can use this study as a foundation for further understanding how performance is related to various construction professions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | performance; performance construct; project manager; skill set; talent development; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | principal component analysis, profession, labour shortage, supervisor, performance measurement, construction organization, project manager, specialty contractor, program, methodology, questionnaire, performance criteria, United States, surveying, strategy, survey, construction company |
| Subjects: | health monitoring assessment and metrics, data collection methods, profession, statistical analysis, software systems, economics, management, performance measurement, professional practice, practitioner, institututions, organization, Geography, research methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Supply Chain Management, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here