Examining the mediating roles of social malaise and religious manipulations in corruption manifestations: The case of the construction sector

Olugboyega, O; Ejohwomu, O A and Omopariola, E D (2025) Examining the mediating roles of social malaise and religious manipulations in corruption manifestations: The case of the construction sector. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(3), pp. 1457-1477. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: As the foundation for understanding the dynamics of the construction sector's corruption, this study examines building contractors' experiences of the stifling of moral, communal and cultural values in the name of modern social and religious principles. Design/methodology/approach: This study's objective was accomplished in two phases. First, a theoretical model was constructed. The theory is then tested using structural equation modeling in the second section. The theory suggests that, based on social norm and institutional theories, social disquietude and religious manipulation influence the interaction and types of corruption in the Nigerian construction sector. From this theory, it was deduced that social malaise (hypothesis 1) and religious manipulations (hypothesis 2) mediate the processes and forms of corruption in the construction sector. To validate the hypotheses, a structural equation model (SEM) was developed and tested. Findings: Native intelligence, new values, social quests and poverty are the social malaises that are profoundly responsible for corruption manifestations in the construction industry. The findings confirmed that construction stakeholders are heavily influenced financially and spiritually by religious organizations. Construction stakeholders engage in corrupt activities as a result of the ravenousness and self-interest bestowed on them by religious manipulation and the significant contribution of social malaise. The study admits that social engineering is required to integrate local wisdom and values into Nigerian society in order to mitigate the negative consequences of social unrest and religious manipulations. Research limitations/implications: This study has contributed to a branch of the literature on corruption in the construction industry that aims to identify the hidden factors that drive the sector's corruption dynamics. It has shown how many different problems in society and religious beliefs can make building contractors more likely to be dishonest. In order to improve project delivery, this study emphasized the importance of investigating the relationship between religious affiliations, religious doctrines and domination and religious competition on corruption in the construction industry. Social implications: Following the findings of this study, the majority of construction stakeholders place their trust in unmerited favor, "spirit money," prosperity gospels and the payment of offerings and "seed money" to win contracts. This implies that construction stakeholders will most likely be deceptive in their dealings, increasing the quantity of certified work, increasing variation claims and engaging in collusion. This is because their faith in inconceivable favors and the exchange of offerings for blessings would lead them to perceive fraudulent practices as a favor. Originality/value: This study is unique in that it sought to determine whether construction stakeholders' corrupt tendencies stem from religious manipulations and complex social systems.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; corruption; religion; religious manipulations; social ills; sustained corruption
Index terms: building contractor, institutional theory, religion, poverty, social system, structural equation model, dynamics, project delivery, construction industry, interaction, society, collusion, structural equation modelling, competition, corruption, methodology, variation, construction sector
Subjects: practitioner, research methods, tendering, professional ethics, communities and social development, behavioral psychology, market analysis, project delivery, social theory, contractual condition, culture and identity, industry analysis, statistical analysis, systems engineering, sociology
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Contract Administration, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Ethics, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here