Sruthilaya, D; Vilventhan, A and Gopal, P R C (2025) Development of a project complexity measurement model for metro rail projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(4), pp. 2728-2744. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to develop a project complexity index (PCI) model using the best and worst method (BWM) to quantitatively analyze the impact of project complexities on the performance of metro rail projects. Design/methodology/approach: This study employed a two-phase research methodology. The first phase identifies complexities through a literature review and expert discussions and categorizes different types of complexities in metro rail projects. In the second phase, BWM, a robust multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique, was used to prioritize key complexities, and a PCI model was developed. Further, the developed PCI was validated through case studies, and sensitivity analysis was performed to check the accuracy and applicability of the developed PCI model. Findings: The analysis revealed that location complexity exerted the most substantial influence on project performance, followed by environmental, organizational, technological and contractual complexities. Sensitivity analysis revealed the varying impacts of complexity indices on the overall project complexity. Practical implications: The study's findings offer a novel approach for measuring project complexity's impact on metro rail projects. This allows stakeholders to make informed decisions, allocate resources efficiently and plan strategically. Originality/value: The existing studies on project complexity identification and quantification were limited to megaprojects other than metro rail projects. Efforts to quantitatively study and analyze the impact of project complexity on metro rail projects are left unattended. The developed PCI model and its validation contribute to the field by providing a definite method to measure and manage complexity in metro rail projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | best-worst method; complexity index; megaprojects; metro rail projects; project complexity |
| Index terms: | megaproject, project complexity, railway construction, complexity, validation, methodology, accuracy, literature review, sensitivity analysis, multi-criteria decision-making, project performance, research methodology, case study, quantification |
| Subjects: | research design and methodology, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, civil engineering, project management theory and practice, professional development, measurement and scaling, decision analysis, systems engineering, strategic project management, research methods, organizational theory, environmental hazards |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Sustainability, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here