Momade, M H; Durdyev, S; Dixit, S; Shahid, S and Alkali, A K (2024) Modeling labor costs using artificial intelligence tools. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 42(6), pp. 1263-1281. ISSN 2398-4708
Abstract
Purpose: Construction projects in Malaysia are often delayed and over budget due to heavy reliance on labor. Linear regression (LR) models have been used in most labor cost (LC) studies, which are less accurate than machine learning (ML) tools. Construction management applications have increasingly used ML tools in recent years and have greatly impacted forecasting. The research aims to identify the most influential LC factors using statistical approaches, collect data and forecast LC models for improved forecasts of LC. Design/methodology/approach: A thorough literature review was completed to identify LC factors. Experienced project managers were administered to rank the factors based on importance and relevance. Then, data were collected for the six highest ranked factors, and five ML models were created. Finally, five categorical indices were used to analyze and measure the effectiveness of models in determining the performance category. Findings: Worker age, construction skills, worker origin, worker training/education, type of work and worker experience were identified as the most influencing factors on LC. SVM provided the best in comparison to other models. Originality/value: The findings support data-driven regulatory and practice improvements aimed at improving labor issues in Malaysia, with the possibility for replication in other countries facing comparable problems.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | forecasting; machine learning tools; performance metrics; productivity; r-index; support vector machine |
| Index terms: | methodology, construction project, machine learning, performance metric, literature review, effectiveness, labour cost, modelling, project manager, forecasting, Malaysia, influencing factor, productivity, artificial intelligence tool |
| Subjects: | risk assessment, profession, artificial intelligence, data analysis and analytics, prediction and forecasting, management, performance measurement, performance management, cost management, analytical methods, production management, Geography, research methods |
| Topics: | Procurement, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here