McCall, V; Gibb, K and Wang, Y (2025) The "fight" for adaptations: Exploring the drivers and barriers to implementing home and environment modifications that support healthy ageing. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 43(2), pp. 159-176. ISSN 2398-4708
Abstract
Purpose: The ageing and disabled population is fast growing, which emphasises the need to effectively modify current homes and environments to support healthy ageing and increasingly diverse health needs. This paper aims to bring together findings and analyses from three adaptations-focussed projects, drawing on perspectives from key stakeholders alongside the lived experiences of service users acquiring adaptations. Design/methodology/approach: Following an Adaptations Framework developed from interviews and focus groups with older people and key stakeholders, the paper discusses barriers experienced by older people and front-line workers in receiving and delivering adaptations through all stages of the process. Findings: This paper reveals how experiences around adaptations might diverge with unseen, hidden investment and need amongst individuals, and how conceptual and cost-focussed evidence gaps impact wider understandings of adaptations delivery. In so doing, this paper highlights how the adaptations process is perceived as a "fight" that does not work smoothly for either those delivering or receiving adaptations services. Research limitations/implications: The paper suggests a systematic failure such that the adaptations process needs to be rehauled, reset and prioritised within social and public policy if the housing, health and social care sectors are to support healthy ageing and prepare for the future ageing population. Originality/value: The paper brings together insights from key stakeholders alongside service users' experiences of adaptations to highlight key policy drivers and barriers to accessing and delivering adaptations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accessibility; ageing; disability; future-proofing; home improvement; housing; housing support; systems thinking |
| Index terms: | disability, housing, public policy, social care, evidence, methodology, older people, population, drawing, systems thinking, focus group, interview, disabled, ageing population, adaptation, accessibility |
| Subjects: | research methods, inclusive design, demography, user focus, evaluation and assessment methods, construction type, public policy, analytical methods, health conditions and diseases, sociology, data collection methods, technical documentation |
| Topics: | Governance, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Health and Safety, Ethics |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here