Oyegoke, A S; Ajayi, S; Abbas, M A and Ogunlana, S (2025) Development of a smart home suitability indicator and indicative self-assessment platform for the disabled facilities grants (dfgs). International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 43(2), pp. 139-158. ISSN 2398-4708
Abstract
Purpose: Delay in housing adaptation is a major problem, especially in assessing if homes are suitable for the occupants and in determining if the occupants are qualified for the Disabled Facilities Grant (DFG). This paper describes the development of two self-administered intelligent integrated assessment tools from the DFG Adapt-ABLE system: (1) The Home Suitability Assessment Platform, which is a preventive mechanism that allows assessment of the suitability of homes based on occupants' mobility status and (2) an indicative assessment platform that determines if the applicants are qualified for the DFG to prevent lengthy delays. Design/methodology/approach: The adopted method aligned with a development study approach: a grounded literature review, a severity measurement approach, two stakeholder engagement workshops, four brainstorming sessions and four focus group exercises. The system development relied on Entity–Relationship Diagram (ERD) technique for data structures and database systems design. It uses DFG context sensitivity with alignment with DFG guidance, interlinkages and interoperability between the assessment tools and other platforms of the integrated Adapt-ABLE system. Findings: The assessment tools are client-level outcomes related to accessibility, usability and activity based on the assessment process. The home suitability platform shows the percentage of the suitability of a home with assessment results that suggest appropriate action plans based on individual mobility status. The indicative assessment combines the function of referral, allocation, assessment and test of resources into an integrated platform. This enables timely assessment, decision-making and case-escalation by Occupational Therapists based on needs criteria and the eligibility threshold. Originality/value: These assessment tools are useful for understanding occupants' perception of their physical housing environment in terms of accessibility, suitability and usability based on basic activities of daily living and their mobility status. The indicative self-assessment tool will substantially cut down the application journey. The developed tools have been recommended for use in the CSJ Disability Commission report and the UK government Guidance on DFGs for local authorities in England.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | assessment tools; disabled facilities grants; home suitability score; housing adaptation; lengthy delays; UK |
| Index terms: | mobility, platform, exercise, workshop, accessibility, England, adaptation, database, stakeholder engagement, eligibility, interoperability, systems design, focus group, disabled, smart home, usability, literature review, local authority, referral, methodology, decision-making, disability, housing, suitability, data structure |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, data science, data collection methods, user-centered design, design methods, community and social dimensions, data management, decision analysis, sociology, health conditions and diseases, infrastructure and transport systems, design criteria, systems and processes, design practice, employment law, professional development, construction type, user focus, health behaviours and lifestyles, inclusive design, research methods, Geography, digital design |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Ethics, Legal Issues, Risk Management, Geographical Context, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here