Liang, J; Vishnupriya, V; Le, A and Shen, X (2025) Future directions for advancing Green Star nz to achieve zero-carbon goals: Insights from industry professionals. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 43(8), pp. 41-58. ISSN 2398-4708
Abstract
Purpose: The building industry is a critical sector that must significantly reduce its carbon emissions for New Zealand (NZ) to meet its 2050 zero-carbon goals. Green Star NZ, a leading Green Building Rating System in NZ, offers a structured framework for assessing and certifying building environmental performance. This research investigates industry professionals' perspectives on Green Star NZ's effectiveness in achieving NZ's zero-carbon goals, addressing gaps in existing literature. Design/methodology/approach: Through qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews, the research identified key areas where Green Star NZ either supports or falls short of zero-carbon practices, according to 22 practising professionals. A thematic analysis method was used to analyse the data. Findings: The results indicate that while Green Star NZ suits NZ, it faces adoption challenges due to few supportive policies, complex certification and material supply issues with sustainable materials. The study addressed these barriers through targeted policies, streamlined processes and market support for sustainable technologies. Moreover, cost is directly or indirectly tied to Green Star NZ. Originality/value: This study offers insights and recommendations to improve Green Star NZ, assisting NZGBC and stakeholders in advancing towards a zero-carbon future. Implementing these suggestions can boost Green Star NZ's effectiveness. Through the project experience and the viewpoints of industry professionals, it fills the research gap by assessing Green Star NZ's framework, identifying challenges and proposing improvements. The findings also position NZ's experience as a possible model, advancing global green building practices and providing policymakers with recommendations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | green building rating system; Green Star nz; New Zealand; sustainability; technologies; zero carbon |
| Index terms: | methodology, green building, qualitative analysis, thematic analysis, sustainable material, interview, certification, face, building industry, effectiveness, environmental performance, carbon emission, New Zealand, falls |
| Subjects: | research design and methodology, data collection methods, industry analysis, administrative processes, performance management, health risk and incident analysis, design practice, methods and analysis, psychology, climate science, sustainable materials, research methods, sustainability assessment, Geography |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Construction Materials, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here