Dodanwala, T C and Santoso, D S (2025) Critical factors influencing the bid/no-bid decisions of small and medium-sized contractors in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 21(1), pp. 24-49. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
The significance of the factors influencing bid/no-bid decisions varies significantly depending on the organization's size and geographical region. The present study examined the critical factors influencing the bid/no-bid decisions of small and medium-sized contractors in Sri Lanka. Primary data were collected from 160 small and 118 medium-sized contractors in Sri Lanka through a questionnaire survey. The respondents were requested to rate the relative importance of 43 factors, and consequently, critical factors were identified. In-depth interviews with six industry experts were conducted to obtain a deeper understanding of the critical factors. Small-sized contractors perceived project size, availability of capital, timeliness of client in the payments process, current workload, and general overhead as the five most critical factors in the bid reasoning process. In contrast, medium-sized contractors deemed project size, current workload, type of project, availability of qualified staff, and duration of project vital in their bid/no-bid decision reasoning process. This study's findings bridge the literature gap by prioritizing the factors most relevant to small and medium-sized contractors' bid/no-bid decisions in South Asia. The study further qualitatively assessed the critical factors and added insight into the governing mechanisms behind the critical factors, an area often neglected in the literature.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bid/no-bid decisions; bidding decisions; construction industry; tendering; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | questionnaire, Asia, bidding, bid/no-bid, reasoning, relative importance, interview, survey, workload, Sri Lanka, duration, construction industry, prioritizing, critical factor |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, project controls, industry analysis, management, regions and continents, data collection methods, risk assessment, cognitive psychology, Geography, bidding |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Procurement, Geographical Context, Time Control, Human Resources, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here