Wong, P F; Tan, X Y and Lou, E C W (2025) Assessing the adoption of blockchain technology in smart sustainable cities: Insights from construction practitioners in Malaysia. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 21(2), pp. 141-163. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
In response to rapid urbanization and associated challenges, city planners worldwide are increasingly turning to the development of smart sustainable cities (SSC). Blockchain technology has emerged as a disruptive force with the potential to facilitate this transformation. While existing research has explored the concept, features, and applications of blockchain within SSC, limited attention has been given to the perspectives of construction practitioners regarding its adoption. This study seeks to address this gap by assessing the acceptance level of construction practitioners toward blockchain technology in SSC. Through the distribution of questionnaires to construction practitioners, comprising 153 responses, this research reveals a generally high level of acceptability toward blockchain technology in SSC, with notable exceptions in property or asset transactions and data management. Furthermore, significant disparities in acceptance were observed across different age groups and educational backgrounds, with older generations and those with lower levels of education demonstrating lower levels of acceptance. These findings provide valuable insights for city planners and relevant authorities, enabling them to design informed strategies and roadmaps to ensure the successful integration of blockchain technology in SSC by considering the acceptance levels of construction practitioners.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | acceptance; blockchain; construction practitioners; decentralisation; smart sustainable cities |
| Index terms: | construction practitioner, strategy, questionnaire, integration, transformation, sustainable city, data management, decentralization, Malaysia, urbanization, blockchain, disparity, planner |
| Subjects: | social justice, urban design, Geography, urban planning, data management, organizational analysis, political science, management, professional development, business, profession, data collection methods, computing systems |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Roles and Professions, Governance, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Ethics, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here