de Paula, A L; Marchezini, V and Mendes, T S G (2025) Participatory analysis of disaster risk creation in Brazilian coastal cities: Bridging remote sensing and citizen generated data. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 16(3), pp. 378-401. ISSN 1759-5908
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aimed to develop a participatory methodology to analyze the disaster risk creation in coastal cities, based on an approach that combines social, urban, environmental and disaster risk elements. Design/methodology/approach: The methodology uses some aspects of three theoretical approaches in a complementary way: i) the Pressure and Release (PAR) framework for the identification of dynamic pressures that contribute to disaster risk creation; ii) the application of Drivers, Pressure, State, Impact, Response (DPSIR) framework to analyze environmental dimensions; and iii) urban analysis, applying the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) tool to classify urban processes. The methodology combined the use of satellite remote sensing data to analyze the urban sprawl and citizen science methods to collect social and environmental data, using the case study of the watershed of the Juqueriquerê River in the coastal city of Caraguatatuba, Brazil. The pilot project was part of a local university extension project of the undergraduate course on Architecture and Urban Planning and also engaged residents and city hall representatives. Findings: The satellite remote sense data analysis indicated a continuous urban sprawl between 1985 and 2020, especially in the south of the Juqueriquerê watershed, reducing urban drainage and increasing the extension and water depth of urban flooding and riverine floods. Using citizen science methods, undergraduates identified settlements with limited economic resources to elevate houses and a lack of infrastructure to promote a resilient coastal city. After identifying the dynamic pressures that contribute to disaster risk creation and the weaknesses and strengths of a resilient city, undergraduate students proposed urban planning interventions and gray and green infrastructure projects to mitigate disaster risks. Social implications: The paper identifies urban sprawl in disaster-prone areas as one of the risk factors contributing to disaster. It also comprehensively analyzes differences between different zones in the Juqueriqere River, which will be useful for policy-making. Originality/value: The method presented an interdisciplinary approach that used satellite remote sensing data and citizen science techniques to analyze disaster risks in coastal cities. The multidimensional approach used to evaluate risks is useful and can be replicated in other similar studies to gain a more comprehensive understanding of disaster risks.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | coastal communities; disaster risk reduction; historical evolution of disaster risk; teaching-learning; university extension; vulnerability |
| Index terms: | urban sprawl, data analysis, disaster risk, flooding, Brazil, science, vulnerability, evolution, methodology, disaster risk reduction, drainage, urban planning, satellite, case study, resilient city, green infrastructure, risk factor, remote sensing, undergraduate, dimension |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data analysis and analytics, sustainability and resilience, infrastructure and transport systems, specialized education, environmental science, curriculum development, research products and data, urban planning, financial risk, Geography, research methods, urban form and morphology, environmental hazards, networking |
| Topics: | Education, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Urban Studies, Cost Management, Research Practice, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here