Mohanty, P; Pal, I and Roy, J (2025) Improving community resilience through distributed solar energy as critical infrastructure: A case study of South Asia. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 16(3), pp. 309-327. ISSN 1759-5908
Abstract
Purpose: The analytical framework proposed in this study aims to link the capital portfolio approach to sustaining human well-being, 2015 sustainable development goals and development action ARC-D concepts. Nepal case study is a "tribrid" power generation system that combines distributed solar, hydro and wind power generation capacities for the resilience of a community of around 500 people in a remote village with a total installed capacity of 28 kW. The second case study is about the solarization of 900 health centres in Chhattisgarh, India, with off-grid solar PV with a cumulative capacity of 3 MW. Design/methodology/approach: Critical infrastructure at the community scale needs to be resilient to maintain community-level functionality in the face of adverse impacts. The present study provides two case study sites from Nepal and India to demonstrate various elements of resilience building for critical infrastructures, especially for the energy sector. Findings: Granular technology and distributed generation in Nepal and India can act as critical infrastructure in providing on-demand electricity service to enhance community-level resilience along with future opportunities of scale up. Originality/value: The analytical framework for evaluating community-scale resilience through critical infrastructure design and application of the framework using evidence based on case studies are the original contributions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | access to electricity; distributed electricity generation; enabling investment; granular technology; modern energy; vulnerability and resilience |
| Index terms: | solar energy, functionality, face, evidence, vulnerability, methodology, well-being, Asia, wind power, electricity generation, analytical framework, case study, distributed generation, community resilience, Nepal, sustainable development goal, power generation, energy sector, critical infrastructure, India |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, mental health and wellbeing, energy systems, data analysis and analytics, regions and continents, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, evaluation and assessment methods, psychology, design features, sustainable design, Geography, social equity, research methods, environmental hazards |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here