Marantzidis, I and Gidado, K (2011) The maximisation of the use of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) in the Greek construction industry. In: Egbu, C and Lou, E C W (eds.) Proceedings of 27th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2011, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
The use of secondary and recycled materials in the construction industry has become an essential method to implement sustainable development in the construction industry. The use of asphalt planings, which is derived from the replacement of deteriorated road pavements, as an alternative construction material to build reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) converts waste into an asset. Its use contributes to the global objective of sustainable development through protection of the environment by prudent use of natural resources. Notwithstanding the benefits, the progress in using RAP has been relatively slow in many countries. Several barriers inhibit the use of RAP to a varying degree across the globe. Literature has provided evidence that the effects of these barriers are influenced by technical and non-technical environmental factors which vary from country to country. The use of RAP in the Greek construction industry is very low; this paper therefore aims at identifying the barriers inhibiting the use of RAP in Greece and to establish how they are affected by the environmental factors identified in literature. The collection of data was based on the critical appraisal of the literature and the use of structured interviews with key stakeholders in Greece. The paper made recommendations on how the level of recycling of asphalt planings could be improved in the Greek construction industry.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | recycling; reclaimed asphalt pavement; sustainability |
| Index terms: | asphalt pavement, interview, maximization, Greece, natural resource, sustainable development, recycling, evidence, construction material, replacement, construction industry, recycled materials, environmental factor, appraisal |
| Subjects: | health safety and environment, Geography, factor and component analysis, algorithms, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, materials science, waste management, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, environmental science, building materials, environmental resource management |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here