Assaf, M; Al-Hussein, M and Li, X (2024) Critical review of virtual reality applications in offsite construction research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(11): 03124007, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Offsite construction (OSC) techniques are argued to provide superior quality and shorter schedules compared with traditional techniques. Nonetheless, the pace of OSC implementation has been slow due to the influence of several barriers. In recent years, virtual reality (VR) applications have been used to address many of these barriers and promote the implementation of OSC projects. However, a comprehensive and coherent literature review that establishes the current state and categorizes VR applications in OSC projects is still lacking. To address this research gap, this study provides a state-of-The-Art review of VR applications in OSC (VR-OSC) using the scientometric and systematic review methods. This study characterizes the synthesis between VR and OSC and identifies research trends and gaps that can be studied in future VR-OSC research. The scientometric review focuses on identifying the main topics of both research domains separately and combined based on the collected articles. The systematic review, meanwhile, qualitatively evaluates these articles, highlighting the existing research gaps and anticipating future research frontiers. The scientometric results indicate that VR applications in OSC can be organized into a number of clusters, such as Crane Operations and Onsite Planning, Educational Applications, Safety and Ergonomics, and Evaluation of Design Alternatives. The qualitative analysis identifies several future research directions to advance the field of VR-OSC, including (1) multiuser VR models in crane operation planning, (2) consideration of the role of human emotions in VR safety training by adopting biometric sensors, (3) decentralized web-VR platforms for remote OSC planning, and (4) VR-solutions for modeling robotic movements in OSC factories. This study can serve as a useful point of reference for VR-OSC researchers and provides a sound foundation for future research on VR-OSC.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | biometric sensing; digital twin; offsite construction; scientometric review; systematic review; virtual reality |
| Index terms: | platform, literature review, state of the art, virtual reality, systematic literature review, modelling, digital twin, movement, safety training, qualitative analysis, ergonomics, implementation, onsite |
| Subjects: | research dissemination and communication, occupational health and safety management, research evaluation and metrics, digital engineering, health behaviours and lifestyles, digital design, virtual reality, contractual arrangements, analytical methods, building construction, research design and methodology, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Digital Applications, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here