Dynamic fleet configuration model for optimizing earthmoving operations using mixed integer linear programming

Khallaf, Z; Alshibani, A; Alsawafy, O; Mohammed, A and Bubshait, A (2024) Dynamic fleet configuration model for optimizing earthmoving operations using mixed integer linear programming. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(11): 04024152, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Practitioners in construction management primarily focus on two key indicators of project success: total cost and completion time. Heavy equipment and machinery play pivotal role in determining these measures, representing significant cost elements in various heavy construction projects such as road construction. Consequently, there is a pressing need for an efficient approach to determining the optimal scheduling of these heavy resources to minimize costs and shorten completion times. This paper proposes an innovative approach to address this challenge by introducing a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model. The aim is to identify the optimal configuration for heavy equipment in earthmoving operations. The dynamic nature of the configuration process is adopted, enabling daily updates to the schedule based on the contractor's available resources. Moreover, environmental considerations are integrated into the decision-making process, ensuring a comprehensive approach to project optimization. To demonstrate the superiority of the developed model, three case projects from the literature have been solved. The proposed model led to a significant improvement in project cost, with an average enhancement of 25%, and in completion time, with an average improvement of 50% compared with the literature case studies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction management; dynamic fleet configuration; earthmoving optimization; fleet management; mixed integer linear programming
Index terms: completion time, practitioner, configuration, project cost, mixed integer, scheduling, earthmoving, heavy construction, key indicator, road construction, decision-making process, linear programming, project success, case study
Subjects: project management theory and practice, civil engineering, economics, systems engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, decision analysis, project controls, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, project delivery, algorithms, practitioner, construction operations, operations research
Topics: Risk Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Time Control, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here