Liu, J; Yan, X and Gao, W (2024) A dualistic perspective of opportunity and risk: The impact of head-mounted augmented reality on construction onsite hazard identification of workers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(11): 04024160, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Head-mounted augmented reality (HMD AR) technology in construction has shown promise in enhancing operational efficiency. Concurrently, the critical role of hazard identification (HI) in ensuring worker safety is well-documented. Despite this, studies delving into HMD AR's impact on HI, especially across varying task complexities, are limited. This study aims to bridge this gap by examining the influence of HMD AR on construction workers' HI in diverse task environments. The research engaged 48 participants in an experiment to evaluate their hazard situation awareness (HSA), cognitive load (CL), and task performance (TP). These were assessed using the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT), the Situation Awareness Rating Technique (SART), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), and measures of task accuracy. Findings indicated that environmental conditions significantly modulate HMD AR's effect on HI. In simple and safe scenes, HMD AR has a negligible impact on HI and might enhance hazard detection capabilities. However, in complex and hazardous situations with intense workloads, HMD AR can impair HI, potentially increasing safety risks. In other words, whether HMD AR brings opportunities or risks for HI depends on the different environmental conditions. This research contributes to the nascent field of cognitive safety in HMD AR, specifically regarding HI in construction, augmenting the current understanding and laying a theoretical groundwork for HMD AR's future safety applications in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry. The insights gained inform the prudent implementation, training, and interface design of HMD AR on construction sites. In the context of HMD AR's rapid evolution, this study underscores the importance of critically assessing safety implications to guide the responsible utilization of new technologies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cognitive behavior and performance; cognitive load; construction hazard identification; head-mounted display augmented reality; situational awareness |
| Index terms: | hazard identification, new technology, efficiency, onsite, construction worker, implementation, workload, accuracy, experiment, construction site, environmental conditions, complexity, augmented reality, evolution |
| Subjects: | building construction, financial risk, visualization, innovation and technology management, contractual arrangements, environmental science, practitioner, systems engineering, performance management, management, professional development, work location, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Procurement, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here