Mei, X; Ma, W; Xu, F and Zhang, Z (2024) Vision-based detection of unsafe worker guardrail climbing based on posture and instance segmentation data fusion. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(11): 04024156, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Currently, the incidence of accidents involving falls from height at construction sites caused by workers climbing guardrails is still high. Traditional unsafe behavior management mainly relies on a safety patrol of construction-site supervisors, which consumes considerable laborpower and time. There is still a critical need for an automated safety management method to identify unsafe guardrail climbing behavior. This study proposes a worker behavior identification method based on visual data fusion of a worker's surrounding environment and posture data. Videos of seven participants' guardrail climbing behavior through multiangle and multidistance cameras were analyzed to verify this method. By analyzing the environment and posture of the participants, three methods based on environment, posture, and fusion data were used to detect the stage of guardrail climbing action of the workers and compare them with the ground truth labeled by safety experts. The precision and recall of worker guardrail climbing behavior based on the fusion method were 82% and 83% respectively, which is better performance than that obtained using a single method. The data fusion-based method avoids the misjudgment generated by a single detection method and can identify the guardrail climbing behavior more accurately.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction safety; environment; guardrail climbing behavior; posture detection; vision-based data fusion |
| Index terms: | unsafe behaviour, identification method, construction site, construction safety, safety management, falls, data fusion, site supervisor |
| Subjects: | financial risk, practitioner, health risk and incident analysis, occupational health and safety management, environmental health, work location, data science, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Research Practice, Site Management, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here